Fredag 10 Januari | 22:50:05 Europe / Stockholm

Kalender

Tid*
2025-10-30 07:00 Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q3
2025-08-06 07:00 Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q2
2025-04-24 07:00 Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q1
2025-04-09 N/A Årsstämma
2025-02-13 07:00 Bokslutskommuniké 2024
2024-10-31 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q3
2024-08-08 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q2
2024-04-25 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q1
2024-03-13 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2024-03-12 - Årsstämma
2024-02-16 - Bokslutskommuniké 2023
2023-10-26 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q3
2023-08-03 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q2
2023-04-28 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q1
2023-03-15 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2023-03-14 - Årsstämma
2023-02-16 - Bokslutskommuniké 2022
2022-10-27 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q3
2022-08-04 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q2
2022-04-28 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q1
2022-03-16 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2022-03-15 - Årsstämma
2022-02-17 - Bokslutskommuniké 2021
2021-10-28 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q3
2021-08-06 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q2
2021-04-22 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q1
2021-03-17 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2021-03-16 - Årsstämma
2021-02-18 - Bokslutskommuniké 2020
2020-10-29 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q3
2020-08-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q2
2020-04-23 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q1
2020-03-11 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2020-03-10 - Årsstämma
2020-02-14 - Bokslutskommuniké 2019
2019-11-01 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q3
2019-08-09 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q2
2019-04-25 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q1
2019-03-15 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2019-03-14 - Årsstämma
2019-02-15 - Bokslutskommuniké 2018
2018-11-01 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q3
2018-08-09 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q2
2018-04-27 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q1
2018-03-14 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2018-03-13 - Årsstämma
2018-02-16 - Bokslutskommuniké 2017
2017-10-23 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q3
2017-08-10 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q2
2017-04-27 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q1
2017-03-15 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning QTCOM 0.00 EUR
2017-03-14 - Årsstämma

Beskrivning

LandFinland
ListaLarge Cap Helsinki
SektorInformationsteknik
IndustriProgramvara
QT Group är verksamt inom IT-sektorn. Koncernen utvecklar diverse utvecklingsverktyg för den globala marknaden. Tekniken baseras på QT-teknologi och används för att utveckla multiplattformsgränssnitt och tillhörande applikationer. Tjänsterna används i bland annat industrirobotar, underhållningssystem, samt fordonssystem. Verksamhet innehas på global nivå och kunderna återfinns inom fordons- och flygindustrin.
2024-09-10 13:00:00
  • Almost two-thirds (63%) of embedded code from development teams with a platform engineering strategy is still written with custom-made solutions
  • Working across devices and OS environments is a top challenge for more than half (51%) of embedded teams with a platform engineering strategy
  • Talent shortage hinders 50% of embedded teams from scaling their platform engineering strategy

Espoo, Finland, September 10, 2024 - Platform engineering is meant to bring about automation, self-service capabilities, and streamlined workflows into software development. Yet nearly two-thirds (63%) of embedded software from organizations with a platform engineering strategy is still created with custom, ad hoc solutions, according to 2024 research (https://www.qt.io/boost-productivity-with-platform-engineering) fromForrester Consulting (https://www.forrester.com/bold) commissioned by Qt Group (https://www.qt.io/). This is despite the respondents' perceived maturity of their organization's platform engineering strategy: 65% see their platform as the foundation upon which embedded software is built, with ongoing efforts to enhance capabilities and increase automation and use case coverage.

The findings highlight the difficulty many embedded teams face trying to straddle the line between productivity and compliance with strict quality and safety requirements.

Embedded teams need flexible, scalable platforms compliant with safety & quality standards

In fact, the need for quality is why most embedded teams pursue platform engineering in the first place. The top business benefits they associate with platform engineering include:

●         Improved end-customer experience (68%) due to more reliable, higher-quality software.

●         Enhanced compliance with industry standards and security (56%).

●         Improved brand identity (57%) and workflow efficiency (54%) due to streamlined workflows that help maintain a consistent look and functionality across products.

However, half of embedded developers with a platform engineering strategy (49%) struggle to balance reusability of standardized, high-quality components with the need to adapt platforms to various use cases, hardware, and software solutions. The specific needs of software and hardware platforms, combined with the need to integrate a variety of non-standardized devices and functionalities, still impose a large amount of custom development on teams, preventing them from maximizing the value from their platforms.

●         51% say it's hard to work across devices, operating systems, hardware and form factors

●        44% say embedded systems lack unified UI/UX design processes for accessibility and inclusivity

●        41% say cross-functional collaboration is hard across design, development, testing, and deployment

●        43% struggle to maintain self-service capabilities for most use cases

Despite this, almost everyone (93%) says their company's leadership supports existing platform engineering strategies.

"We have noticed a gap in the market between the perceived maturity of platform engineering strategies and actual benefits derived from them. Too much work is still being done manually to address the specific needs, whether it be in sectors like medtech, automotive, or industrial automation," says Juhapekka Niemi, Senior Vice President, Product Management at Qt Group. "Platforms should be designed to support change, integrate with evolving technology, and work across a variety of hardware and software platforms. Leveraging a flexible, scalable, and quality-assured framework is key - as is using optimized cross-platform components that are easily deployable. This has been Qt's guiding principle for many years, and it's why we've seen many customers leverage the Qt Framework as the cornerstone of their platform strategy."

Embedded teams need to foster a thriving ecosystem and talent community

Because embedded development requires diverse specialized skills, 50% of respondents say talent shortages are the top blockers to better platform strategies. Other key blockers include difficulty integrating legacy platforms (49%) and cultural resistance from product teams (34%).

"On the one hand, embedded engineers face the challenge of understanding the end-user experience for the technical machines they design," says Maurice Kalinowski, Product Director at Qt Group. "On the other, more widely available web developers, who focus on usability, face steep learning curves in adapting to the embedded space and its intricacies like C/C++ plug-ins, cross platform development, etc. This makes the need for unifying standards stronger than ever."

Embedded teams want integration capabilities with best-of-breed tools

Selecting the right tools is critical for an effective platform engineering strategy. As for what the right tool is, the dominant theme is that respondents want tools with lots of integration capabilities, and they want those tools to have comprehensive security.

Over half (52%) of embedded teams with a platform engineering strategy prioritize dedicated, best-of-breed tools that seamlessly work together with existing tech. Just a third (35%) prioritize all-in-one, end-to-end capabilities. Integration is important to respondents in situations where, for example, specialized security tools need to be compatible within a development framework to ensure robust protection without compromising on performance. To that point, 49% deem safety, security, and compliance as an essential outcome of their platform engineering strategy. Around 43% also emphasized the importance of customizable APIs for third-party integrations.

"Different APIs have varying agreements and latency times, exposing systems to more security risks and privacy regulations, as developers need to ensure the third-party software handles sensitive data appropriately," says Miao Luo, Director, Technology Strategy at Qt Group. "The best way for platform teams to mitigate this is by closely monitoring technical debt and minimizing the number of third-party elements in play."

Note to the Editors
This Forrester Consulting study, commissioned by Qt, surveyed 317 decision-makers and influencers responsible for their organization's platform engineering strategy.

About Qt Group
Qt Group (Nasdaq Helsinki: QTCOM) is a global software company, trusted by industry leaders and over 1.5 million developers worldwide to create applications and smart devices that users love. We help our customers to increase productivity through the entire product development lifecycle: from UI design and software development to quality management and deployment. Our customers are in more than 70 different industries in over 180 countries. Qt Group employs some 800 people, and its net sales in 2023 were 180.7 MEUR. To learn more, visit www.qt.io. (https://www.qt.io/?hsLang=en)

Media contact
qt@babelpr.com