Tisdag 28 Juli | 06:08:55 Europe / Stockholm
Est. tid*
2027-02-11 07:30 Bokslutskommuniké 2026
2026-11-05 07:30 Kvartalsrapport 2026-Q3
2026-07-22 - Kvartalsrapport 2026-Q2
2026-05-22 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2026-05-21 - Årsstämma
2026-05-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2026-Q1
2026-02-19 - Extra Bolagsstämma 2026
2026-02-17 - Bokslutskommuniké 2025
2025-11-05 - Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q3
2025-08-14 - Extra Bolagsstämma 2025
2025-07-22 - Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q2
2025-05-23 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2025-05-22 - Årsstämma
2025-05-08 - Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q1
2025-02-13 - Bokslutskommuniké 2024
2024-11-06 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q3
2024-07-19 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q2
2024-05-17 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2024-05-16 - Årsstämma
2024-05-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q1
2024-02-15 - Bokslutskommuniké 2023
2023-11-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q3
2023-07-21 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q2
2023-05-19 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2023-05-17 - Årsstämma
2023-04-27 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q1
2023-02-16 - Bokslutskommuniké 2022
2022-11-02 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q3
2022-07-21 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q2
2022-06-09 - Årsstämma
2022-06-01 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2022-04-28 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q1
2022-02-17 - Bokslutskommuniké 2021
2021-11-02 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q3
2021-10-26 - Extra Bolagsstämma 2021
2021-07-16 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q2
2021-06-17 - Split SINCH 1:10
2021-05-19 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2021-05-18 - Årsstämma
2021-04-28 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q1
2021-02-18 - Bokslutskommuniké 2020
2020-11-27 - Extra Bolagsstämma 2020
2020-11-03 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q3
2020-07-17 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q2
2020-05-18 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2020-05-15 - Årsstämma
2020-04-29 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q1
2020-02-20 - Bokslutskommuniké 2019
2019-11-08 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q3
2019-07-19 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q2
2019-05-17 - Årsstämma
2019-05-17 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q1
2019-05-10 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2019-02-22 - Bokslutskommuniké 2018
2018-11-06 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q3
2018-07-20 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q2
2018-05-21 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2018-05-18 - Årsstämma
2018-05-18 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q1
2018-02-16 - Bokslutskommuniké 2017
2017-11-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q3
2017-07-21 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q2
2017-05-19 - Årsstämma
2017-05-19 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q1
2016-12-05 - Extra Bolagsstämma 2016
2016-08-24 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning SINCH 0.00 SEK
2016-08-23 - Bokslutskommuniké 2016
2016-05-19 - Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q3
2016-02-17 - Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q2
2015-11-20 - Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q1
LandSverige
ListaLarge Cap Stockholm
SektorInformationsteknik
IndustriKommunikation
Sinch är ett svenskt teknikbolag som verkar inom den globala marknaden för molnbaserad kommunikation, ofta benämnd CPaaS. Bolaget tillhandahåller plattformar och lösningar för att företag ska kunna kommunicera med sina kunder via SMS, rösttjänster, Rich Communication Services, chattbotar och videokommunikation. Sinch grundades år 2008 och har sitt huvudkontor i Stockholm.

Analysera bolaget i Börsdata!

All ägardata du vill ha finns i Holdings!

Sinch research: 60% of executives are confident their AI programs are succeeding. Only 43% of the teams delivering them agree

2026-07-20 11:00:00

Stockholm, July 20, 2026 - Sinch AB (publ) today announced findings from its global research report, "The AI Production Paradox". The study reveals a significant disconnect between executive confidence and operational reality as enterprises scale AI for customer communications. While 60% of C-suite executives say they are very confident in their organization's AI programs, only 43% of directors and managers responsible for implementing and operating those programs share that confidence.

The survey findings help explain why many organizations may struggle to move AI for customer communications from pilot projects to reliable production deployments. This is a familiar challenge for Sinch as enterprises scale conversational AI across messaging, voice, email, and other customer channels.

 

Overview of findings

      62% of enterprises already have AI agents live in production

      74% have rolled back or shut down a deployed AI agent

      81% rollback rate among organizations with mature governance frameworks

      75% report investment in trust, security and compliance, higher than AI development itself (63%).

      84% of AI engineering teams spend at least half their time on guardrails

      55% have to build custom infrastructure for cross-channel context

      86% have evaluated or are considering new communications providers

      98% are increasing AI investment in 2026

 

"For years, the AI conversation has largely focused on whether organizations can get AI into production. Our research suggests another challenge is emerging: making sure leadership and operational teams are working from the same reality," said Sophie Cheng, Chief Marketing Officer at Sinch. "Executives see investment, deployment, and strategic progress. The teams responsible for delivering AI for customer communications are more likely to see the operational challenges, from governance to communications infrastructure, that ultimately determine whether those initiatives succeed in the real world."

 

The research suggests that the disconnect stems from differing day-to-day experiences rather than strategic priorities. While executives track investment and deployment, implementation teams are more likely to confront the governance, reliability, and communications infrastructure challenges that determine whether AI for customer communications succeeds in production.

 

"The teams closest to AI deployments experience these operational challenges firsthand. When infrastructure falls short, they're the ones responsible for keeping systems running despite those limitations," said Daniel Morris, Chief Product Officer at Sinch. "At Sinch, we believe this reveals a deeper reality. The challenge is more about production readiness than AI capability. We're focused on building the infrastructure layer that helps teams move from experimentation to trusted, reliable, production-scale AI systems for communication."

 

One of the study's clearest findings was that communications infrastructure satisfaction was the strongest predictor of confidence in AI deployment. Organizations with stronger infrastructure foundations consistently reported greater confidence in scaling AI safely and effectively, outperforming factors such as governance maturity, deployment experience, and investment levels.

 

Full Report: The AI Production Paradox

Blog: The AI Production Paradox: What 2,527 enterprise leaders told us

 

 

Methodology

The study was conducted between January and February 2026 by Sinch in collaboration with an independent research institute. A total of 2,527 senior decision-makers participated across the United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Brazil, Germany, France, India, Singapore, Mexico and Canada. Respondents represented large enterprises across financial services, healthcare, telecommunications, technology, retail and professional services. Participants included C-suite executives, vice presidents, directors and managers responsible for AI strategy, implementation and operations.

 

 

For more information, please contact:


Frerik Hallstan

Director Corporate Communications

Mobile: +46 761 15 38 30

E-mail: fredrik.hallstan@sinch.com

 

  Shannon Hames
  PR & Communications Manager, North America

E-mail: shannon.hames@sinch.com

 

Mia Nordlander

SVP Investor Relations & Sustainability Mobile: +46 73 511 53 95

E-mail: mia.nordlander@sinch.com