Onsdag 5 Februari | 12:39:09 Europe / Stockholm

Kalender

Tid*
2025-10-29 08:00 Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q3
2025-07-30 08:00 Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q2
2025-05-08 08:00 Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q1
2025-05-05 N/A Årsstämma
2025-02-19 12:00 Bokslutskommuniké 2024
2024-11-13 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q3
2024-08-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q2
2024-05-24 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2024-05-23 - Årsstämma
2024-05-15 - Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q1
2024-02-21 - Bokslutskommuniké 2023
2023-11-08 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q3
2023-08-09 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q2
2023-05-10 - Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q1
2023-05-04 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2023-05-03 - Årsstämma
2023-02-24 - Bokslutskommuniké 2022
2023-02-23 - Bokslutskommuniké 2022
2022-11-02 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q3
2022-08-10 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q2
2022-05-11 - Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q1
2022-04-29 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2022-04-28 - Årsstämma
2022-02-23 - Bokslutskommuniké 2021
2021-11-17 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q3
2021-08-11 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q2
2021-07-28 - Extra Bolagsstämma 2021
2021-05-21 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2021-05-20 - Årsstämma
2021-05-19 - Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q1
2021-03-03 - Bokslutskommuniké 2020
2020-11-10 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q3
2020-08-18 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q2
2020-06-11 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2020-06-10 - Årsstämma
2020-05-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q1
2020-04-30 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2020-02-27 - Bokslutskommuniké 2019
2019-11-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q3
2019-08-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q2
2019-06-19 - Extra Bolagsstämma 2019
2019-05-14 - Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q1
2019-05-10 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2019-05-09 - Årsstämma
2019-02-27 - Bokslutskommuniké 2018
2018-11-08 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q3
2018-08-08 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q2
2018-05-23 - Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q1
2018-05-11 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2018-05-09 - Årsstämma
2018-02-27 - Bokslutskommuniké 2017
2017-11-08 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q3
2017-08-23 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q2
2017-05-23 - Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q1
2017-04-28 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2017-04-27 - Årsstämma
2017-02-15 - Bokslutskommuniké 2016
2016-11-15 - Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q3
2016-08-23 - Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q2
2016-05-10 - Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q1
2016-04-29 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2016-04-28 - Årsstämma
2016-02-11 - Bokslutskommuniké 2015
2015-10-29 - Kvartalsrapport 2015-Q3
2015-08-13 - Kvartalsrapport 2015-Q2
2015-05-06 - Kvartalsrapport 2015-Q1
2015-05-02 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2015-04-30 - Årsstämma
2015-02-12 - Bokslutskommuniké 2014
2014-11-06 - Kvartalsrapport 2014-Q3
2014-08-26 - Kvartalsrapport 2014-Q2
2014-05-28 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK
2014-05-27 - Årsstämma
2014-05-07 - Kvartalsrapport 2014-Q1
2014-02-27 - Bokslutskommuniké 2013
2013-10-23 - Kvartalsrapport 2013-Q3
2013-08-22 - Kvartalsrapport 2013-Q2
2013-05-23 - X-dag ordinarie utdelning
2013-05-22 - Årsstämma
2013-04-25 - Kvartalsrapport 2013-Q1
2013-02-28 - Bokslutskommuniké 2012
2012-10-26 - Kvartalsrapport 2012-Q3
2012-08-24 - Kvartalsrapport 2012-Q2
2012-05-10 - Årsstämma
2012-04-26 - Kvartalsrapport 2012-Q1
2012-02-16 - Bokslutskommuniké 2011
2011-10-26 - Kvartalsrapport 2011-Q3
2011-08-18 - Kvartalsrapport 2011-Q2
2011-04-27 - Årsstämma
2011-04-27 - Kvartalsrapport 2011-Q1
2011-02-17 - Bokslutskommuniké 2010
2010-10-27 - Kvartalsrapport 2010-Q3
2010-08-19 - Kvartalsrapport 2010-Q2
2010-04-28 - Kvartalsrapport 2010-Q1
2010-02-19 - Bokslutskommuniké 2009
2009-11-26 - X-dag bonusutdelning

Beskrivning

LandNorge
ListaOB Match
SektorHälsovård
IndustriMedicinteknik
Photocure är verksamma inom medicinteknik. Bolaget specialiserar sig inom lösningar för fotodynamisk teknik. Idag används lösningarna för behandling av sjukdomar som föranlett cancer i urinblåsan och HPV. Huvudmarknaderna återfinns inom dermatologi och onkologi, där produkterna används av sjukhus och forskningsinstitut på global nivå. Bolaget grundades 1993 och har huvudkontor i Oslo, Norge.
2020-12-07 07:30:07
PRESS RELEASE - Oslo, Norway, 7 December, 2020: Photocure ASA (OSE:PHO) today<br
/>
announced new data and analyses presented at the 21[st] Annual Meeting of the<br
/>
Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO). Presentations discussed the use of Blue<br
/>
Light Cystoscopy (BLCT) with Cysview[®], in particular the positive impact on<br
/>
patient outcomes in the surveillance setting without a significant impact on
the<br />
cost of care, as well as the benefits of identifying early recurrences in
high<br />
-risk NMIBC patients undergoing BCG treatment.<br />
<br />
The SUO meeting, held virtually this year, is led by internationally renowned<br
/>
urologic oncologists, medical oncologists, and scientists and attracts the<br />
interest of experts from all over the world.<br />
<br />
"The use of BLC with Cysview continues to inspire the scientific community as<br
/>
much as ever for improving the care of patients diagnosed with bladder
cancer.<br />
These new abstracts highlight the role of the procedure throughout patient
care,<br />
especially focusing on the impact on patient management when used in<br />
surveillance. The Budget Impact Model supports the favorable cost-benefit of<br
/>
blue light procedures including in the office setting, while reaffirming its<br
/>
superiority in detection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer compared to
white<br />
light alone. Both healthcare systems and patients clearly benefit from this<br
/>
standard of care procedure", said Dan Schneider, President and CEO of
Photocure.<br />
<br />
<br />
BLC with Cysview abstracts and posters have been prominently featured at the
SUO<br />
meeting, including:<br />
<br />
· Budget Impact of Blue Light Cystoscopy in The Surveillance Setting<br />
<br />
Stephen B. Williams, et al. The University of Texas Medical Branch<br />
The Budget Impact Model was developed based on standard protocols for the<br />
treatment and surveillance of NMIBC. Inputs were based on a simulated
facility<br />
with 50 newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients. Blue Light Cystoscopy (BLC)<br
/>
with Cysview was utilized for all surveillance cystoscopies. In the office<br />
setting, the additional use of flexible BLC for surveillance did not<br />
substantially impact cost and resulted in the identification of 9 recurrences<br
/>
over the course of two years that would otherwise be missed.<br />
<br />
Link to the abstract (https://suo-abstracts.secure<br />
-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/9/details/943)<br />
<br />
<br />
· Using BLC at the 3-Month Post-BCG Cystoscopy, Impact on Cancer Diagnosis,<br
/>
and Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Definition of BCG Response<br />
<br />
Meera R. Chappidi, et al. University of California San Francisco<br />
<br />
"We initiated this study because the utility of blue light cystoscopy (BLC)
for<br />
surveillance in patients receiving BCG treatments is really not well
understood.<br />
Thus, no recommendations exist in current guidelines. Beyond the obvious
benefit<br />
of detecting recurrences that would otherwise be missed, we think that<br />
identifying early recurrences in patients receiving BCG can result in them
being<br />
enrolled into clinical trials for BCG unresponsive disease in a timely
manner",<br />
said Dr. Max Kates, Assistant Professor of Urology and Oncology, Co-Director,<br
/>
Bladder Cancer Multidisplinary Clinic, The James Buchanan Brady Urologic<br />
Institute of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.<br />
<br />
Based on findings from the Blue Light Cystoscopy (BLC) with Cysview Multi<br />
-institutional Registry, BLC-alone identified patients with recurrences after<br
/>
recent BCG treatment that would have been missed with White-light Cystoscopy<br
/>
(WLC) alone. This could be interpreted as WLC-alone incorrectly assessing<br />
inflated complete response rates in comparison to the more accurately
measured<br />
results when BLC is added for surveillance (60% vs 55.3%). The implications
of<br />
misidentified complete responses lead to inflated efficacy results, incorrect<br
/>
statistical findings and misguided conclusions. Future research is needed to<br
/>
clarify how BLC should be used for both entry into clinical trials and for<br />
surveillance while on trials.<br />
<br />
Link to the abstract (https://suo-abstracts.secure<br />
-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/9/details/912)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Note to editors:<br />
<br />
All trademarks mentioned in this release are protected by law and are
registered<br />
trademarks of Photocure ASA<br />
<br />
This press release may contain product details and information which are not<br
/>
valid, or a product is not accessible, in your country. Please be aware that<br
/>
Photocure does not take any responsibility for accessing such information
which<br />
may not comply with any legal process, regulation, registration or usage in
the<br />
country of your origin.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
About Bladder Cancer<br />
Bladder cancer ranks as the sixth most common cancer worldwide with 1 650 000<br
/>
prevalent cases (5-year prevalence rate), 550 000 new cases and almost
200 000<br />
deaths annually in 2018.[1]<br />
<br />
Approx. 75% of all bladder cancer cases occur in men.[1] It has a high<br />
recurrence rate with an average of 61% in year one and 78% over five
years.[2]<br />
Bladder cancer has the highest lifetime treatment costs per patient of all<br />
cancers.[3]<br />
<br />
Bladder cancer is a costly, potentially progressive disease for which
patients<br />
have to undergo multiple cystoscopies due to the high risk of recurrence.
There<br />
is an urgent need to improve both the diagnosis and the management of bladder<br
/>
cancer for the benefit of patients and healthcare systems alike.<br />
<br />
Bladder cancer is classified into two types, non-muscle invasive bladder
cancer<br />
(NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), depending on the depth of<br
/>
invasion in the bladder wall. NMIBC remains in the inner layer of cells
lining<br />
the bladder. These cancers are the most common (75%) of all BC cases and
include<br />
the subtypes Ta, carcinoma in situ (CIS) and T1 lesions. In MIBC the cancer
has<br />
grown into deeper layers of the bladder wall. These cancers, including
subtypes<br />
T2, T3 and T4, are more likely to spread and are harder to treat.[4]<br />
[1] Globocan. Incidence/mortality by<br />
population. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/bar_pop_sel.aspx<br />
[2] Babjuk M, et al. Eur Urol. 2019