Kurs
+2,23%
Kurs
+2,23%
Open
81,00
High
83,60
Low
80,70
Close
82,50
Kursutveckling under dagen för detta pressmeddelande
(NOK).
Likviditet
50,9 MNOK
Likviditet
50,9 MNOK
Rel. mcap
3,25%
Antal aktier
622 696
Likviditet under dagen för detta pressmeddelande
Kalender
Tid* | ||
2025-10-29 | 08:00 | Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q3 |
2025-07-30 | 08:00 | Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q2 |
2025-05-08 | 08:00 | Kvartalsrapport 2025-Q1 |
2025-05-05 | N/A | Årsstämma |
2025-02-19 | 12:00 | Bokslutskommuniké 2024 |
2024-11-13 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q3 |
2024-08-07 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q2 |
2024-05-24 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2024-05-23 | - | Årsstämma |
2024-05-15 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2024-Q1 |
2024-02-21 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2023 |
2023-11-08 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q3 |
2023-08-09 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q2 |
2023-05-10 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2023-Q1 |
2023-05-04 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2023-05-03 | - | Årsstämma |
2023-02-24 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2022 |
2023-02-23 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2022 |
2022-11-02 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q3 |
2022-08-10 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q2 |
2022-05-11 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2022-Q1 |
2022-04-29 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2022-04-28 | - | Årsstämma |
2022-02-23 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2021 |
2021-11-17 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q3 |
2021-08-11 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q2 |
2021-07-28 | - | Extra Bolagsstämma 2021 |
2021-05-21 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2021-05-20 | - | Årsstämma |
2021-05-19 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2021-Q1 |
2021-03-03 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2020 |
2020-11-10 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q3 |
2020-08-18 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q2 |
2020-06-11 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2020-06-10 | - | Årsstämma |
2020-05-07 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2020-Q1 |
2020-04-30 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2020-02-27 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2019 |
2019-11-07 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q3 |
2019-08-07 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q2 |
2019-06-19 | - | Extra Bolagsstämma 2019 |
2019-05-14 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2019-Q1 |
2019-05-10 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2019-05-09 | - | Årsstämma |
2019-02-27 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2018 |
2018-11-08 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q3 |
2018-08-08 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q2 |
2018-05-23 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2018-Q1 |
2018-05-11 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2018-05-09 | - | Årsstämma |
2018-02-27 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2017 |
2017-11-08 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q3 |
2017-08-23 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q2 |
2017-05-23 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2017-Q1 |
2017-04-28 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2017-04-27 | - | Årsstämma |
2017-02-15 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2016 |
2016-11-15 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q3 |
2016-08-23 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q2 |
2016-05-10 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2016-Q1 |
2016-04-29 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2016-04-28 | - | Årsstämma |
2016-02-11 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2015 |
2015-10-29 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2015-Q3 |
2015-08-13 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2015-Q2 |
2015-05-06 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2015-Q1 |
2015-05-02 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2015-04-30 | - | Årsstämma |
2015-02-12 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2014 |
2014-11-06 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2014-Q3 |
2014-08-26 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2014-Q2 |
2014-05-28 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning PHO 0.00 NOK |
2014-05-27 | - | Årsstämma |
2014-05-07 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2014-Q1 |
2014-02-27 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2013 |
2013-10-23 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2013-Q3 |
2013-08-22 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2013-Q2 |
2013-05-23 | - | X-dag ordinarie utdelning |
2013-05-22 | - | Årsstämma |
2013-04-25 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2013-Q1 |
2013-02-28 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2012 |
2012-10-26 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2012-Q3 |
2012-08-24 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2012-Q2 |
2012-05-10 | - | Årsstämma |
2012-04-26 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2012-Q1 |
2012-02-16 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2011 |
2011-10-26 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2011-Q3 |
2011-08-18 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2011-Q2 |
2011-04-27 | - | Årsstämma |
2011-04-27 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2011-Q1 |
2011-02-17 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2010 |
2010-10-27 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2010-Q3 |
2010-08-19 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2010-Q2 |
2010-04-28 | - | Kvartalsrapport 2010-Q1 |
2010-02-19 | - | Bokslutskommuniké 2009 |
2009-11-26 | - | X-dag bonusutdelning |
Beskrivning
Land | Norge |
---|---|
Lista | OB Match |
Sektor | Hälsovård |
Industri | Medicinteknik |
2020-12-07 07:30:07
PRESS RELEASE - Oslo, Norway, 7 December, 2020: Photocure ASA (OSE:PHO) today<br
/>
announced new data and analyses presented at the 21[st] Annual Meeting of the<br
/>
Society of Urologic Oncology (SUO). Presentations discussed the use of Blue<br
/>
Light Cystoscopy (BLCT) with Cysview[®], in particular the positive impact on<br
/>
patient outcomes in the surveillance setting without a significant impact on
the<br />
cost of care, as well as the benefits of identifying early recurrences in
high<br />
-risk NMIBC patients undergoing BCG treatment.<br />
<br />
The SUO meeting, held virtually this year, is led by internationally renowned<br
/>
urologic oncologists, medical oncologists, and scientists and attracts the<br />
interest of experts from all over the world.<br />
<br />
"The use of BLC with Cysview continues to inspire the scientific community as<br
/>
much as ever for improving the care of patients diagnosed with bladder
cancer.<br />
These new abstracts highlight the role of the procedure throughout patient
care,<br />
especially focusing on the impact on patient management when used in<br />
surveillance. The Budget Impact Model supports the favorable cost-benefit of<br
/>
blue light procedures including in the office setting, while reaffirming its<br
/>
superiority in detection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer compared to
white<br />
light alone. Both healthcare systems and patients clearly benefit from this<br
/>
standard of care procedure", said Dan Schneider, President and CEO of
Photocure.<br />
<br />
<br />
BLC with Cysview abstracts and posters have been prominently featured at the
SUO<br />
meeting, including:<br />
<br />
· Budget Impact of Blue Light Cystoscopy in The Surveillance Setting<br />
<br />
Stephen B. Williams, et al. The University of Texas Medical Branch<br />
The Budget Impact Model was developed based on standard protocols for the<br />
treatment and surveillance of NMIBC. Inputs were based on a simulated
facility<br />
with 50 newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients. Blue Light Cystoscopy (BLC)<br
/>
with Cysview was utilized for all surveillance cystoscopies. In the office<br />
setting, the additional use of flexible BLC for surveillance did not<br />
substantially impact cost and resulted in the identification of 9 recurrences<br
/>
over the course of two years that would otherwise be missed.<br />
<br />
Link to the abstract (https://suo-abstracts.secure<br />
-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/9/details/943)<br />
<br />
<br />
· Using BLC at the 3-Month Post-BCG Cystoscopy, Impact on Cancer Diagnosis,<br
/>
and Implications for Clinical Trial Design and Definition of BCG Response<br />
<br />
Meera R. Chappidi, et al. University of California San Francisco<br />
<br />
"We initiated this study because the utility of blue light cystoscopy (BLC)
for<br />
surveillance in patients receiving BCG treatments is really not well
understood.<br />
Thus, no recommendations exist in current guidelines. Beyond the obvious
benefit<br />
of detecting recurrences that would otherwise be missed, we think that<br />
identifying early recurrences in patients receiving BCG can result in them
being<br />
enrolled into clinical trials for BCG unresponsive disease in a timely
manner",<br />
said Dr. Max Kates, Assistant Professor of Urology and Oncology, Co-Director,<br
/>
Bladder Cancer Multidisplinary Clinic, The James Buchanan Brady Urologic<br />
Institute of Johns Hopkins School of Medicine.<br />
<br />
Based on findings from the Blue Light Cystoscopy (BLC) with Cysview Multi<br />
-institutional Registry, BLC-alone identified patients with recurrences after<br
/>
recent BCG treatment that would have been missed with White-light Cystoscopy<br
/>
(WLC) alone. This could be interpreted as WLC-alone incorrectly assessing<br />
inflated complete response rates in comparison to the more accurately
measured<br />
results when BLC is added for surveillance (60% vs 55.3%). The implications
of<br />
misidentified complete responses lead to inflated efficacy results, incorrect<br
/>
statistical findings and misguided conclusions. Future research is needed to<br
/>
clarify how BLC should be used for both entry into clinical trials and for<br />
surveillance while on trials.<br />
<br />
Link to the abstract (https://suo-abstracts.secure<br />
-platform.com/a/gallery/rounds/9/details/912)<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Note to editors:<br />
<br />
All trademarks mentioned in this release are protected by law and are
registered<br />
trademarks of Photocure ASA<br />
<br />
This press release may contain product details and information which are not<br
/>
valid, or a product is not accessible, in your country. Please be aware that<br
/>
Photocure does not take any responsibility for accessing such information
which<br />
may not comply with any legal process, regulation, registration or usage in
the<br />
country of your origin.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
About Bladder Cancer<br />
Bladder cancer ranks as the sixth most common cancer worldwide with 1 650 000<br
/>
prevalent cases (5-year prevalence rate), 550 000 new cases and almost
200 000<br />
deaths annually in 2018.[1]<br />
<br />
Approx. 75% of all bladder cancer cases occur in men.[1] It has a high<br />
recurrence rate with an average of 61% in year one and 78% over five
years.[2]<br />
Bladder cancer has the highest lifetime treatment costs per patient of all<br />
cancers.[3]<br />
<br />
Bladder cancer is a costly, potentially progressive disease for which
patients<br />
have to undergo multiple cystoscopies due to the high risk of recurrence.
There<br />
is an urgent need to improve both the diagnosis and the management of bladder<br
/>
cancer for the benefit of patients and healthcare systems alike.<br />
<br />
Bladder cancer is classified into two types, non-muscle invasive bladder
cancer<br />
(NMIBC) and muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), depending on the depth of<br
/>
invasion in the bladder wall. NMIBC remains in the inner layer of cells
lining<br />
the bladder. These cancers are the most common (75%) of all BC cases and
include<br />
the subtypes Ta, carcinoma in situ (CIS) and T1 lesions. In MIBC the cancer
has<br />
grown into deeper layers of the bladder wall. These cancers, including
subtypes<br />
T2, T3 and T4, are more likely to spread and are harder to treat.[4]<br />
[1] Globocan. Incidence/mortality by<br />
population. Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/bar_pop_sel.aspx<br />
[2] Babjuk M, et al. Eur Urol. 2019